【群学肄言堂】第十二季第1期 | Ideology and Early Post-Colonial Leaderships

讲座信息

 主  题 

Ideology and Early Post-Colonial Leaderships：Why the Left Rose in Burma and the Right in Malaysia

 时  间 

9月30日（周五）13:30-15:30

 地  点 

浙江大学紫金港西区创意大楼A座1127会议室

 概  要 

Politics in newly independent Southeast Asian states was monopolized by elites on either left or right. The ideological turn states took was not contingent on who colonized them. Both Burma and Malaysia were former British colonies, yet early post-colonial leaders in Burma were on the left while those in Malaysia were on the right. What accounts for the dominance of the left or the right in early post-colonial politics? I argue that three factors influenced the rise of either side. First was the relative strength of anti-colonial nationalism in the colonies. Resistance to foreign rule was more common on the left than it was on the right. Where anti-colonialism was strong, as in Burma, influential indigenous parties that emerged under colonial rule were on the left. Where anti-colonialism was weak, as in Malaya, local political interests were likely to coalesce around right-wing parties. Second was the extent to which anti-colonial forces were marginalized by the colonial state before decolonization. In Burma, colonizers did not suppress anti-colonial forces effectively, thereby enabling them to rise. In Malaya, the suppression of anti-colonial forces following World War II minimized the influence of the left in politics. Third, where colonizers’ economic and geopolitical interests were significant, they were likely to sponsor the rise of indigenous elites on the right. British economic and geopolitical interests in Malaysia in the 1960s were significant, but they were much less so in Burma in the late 1940s.

 主讲人 

Marie-Eve Reny is a comparativist who works on China and Southeast Asia and a hundred talents researcher in the Department of Sociology at Zhejiang University. Her work was published in Government & Opposition, Asian Survey, the Journal of Burma Studies, and the Journal of East Asian Studies among other journals. She also has a book with Oxford University Press.

 评议人 

Kurtuluş Gemici is a comparative-historical sociologist working on international finance, the sociology of markets, and theory. His work has appeared in journals such as Theory & Society, Socio-Economic Review, Sociological Theory, and Politics & Society. Recent publications include Capital Mobility and Distributional Conflict (Routledge, 2020) and How Global Are Investment Banks? (Regional Studies, 2020, with Karen Lai). 

 主持人 

Haoyue Li is a cultural sociologist whose work explores the intersection of environmental politics and cultural meanings with an emphasis on China in the globe. Her work has appeared in journals including Qualitative Sociology, Journal of Rural Studies, and other media journals. She is currently working on her book  Crisis, Legitimation and Contention.